Researchers have introduced an AI system called SIDE in response to concerns about the reliability of information obtained solely from Wikipedia. This system serves a dual purpose: confirming the accuracy of primary sources and suggesting alternative sources for reference.
However, it’s crucial to emphasize that SIDE operates under the assumption that the information on Wikipedia is accurate. While it can assess the credibility of a source, it lacks the capability to independently verify the claims within a Wikipedia entry.
A study unveiled intriguing results, indicating that individuals favored the AI’s recommended citations over the original sources in 70% of cases. Interestingly, in nearly half of these instances, SIDE recommended a source already designated as the top reference on Wikipedia. Furthermore, in 21% of cases, SIDE proactively suggested a reference that had already received approval from human annotators.
Despite these noteworthy capabilities, researchers acknowledge the potential existence of alternative AI programs that could surpass SIDE in terms of quality and speed.
It’s worth noting that SIDE primarily focuses on web page references, while Wikipedia draws information from a diverse range of sources, including traditional books, scientific articles, and multimedia content like images and videos.